An Roinn Oideachais agus Eolaíochta

Department of Education and Science

 

 

Subject Inspection of Mathematics

REPORT

 

Ursuline College,

Sligo

Roll number: 65180T

 

Date of inspection:  24 January 2007

Date of issue of report:  17 January 2008

 

 

Subject inspection report

Subject provision and whole school support

Planning and preparation

Teaching and learning

Assessment

Summary of main findings and recommendations

 

 

 

 

Report  on  the Quality of Learning and Teaching in Mathematics

 

 

 

 

Subject inspection report

 

This report has been written following a subject inspection in Ursuline College, Sligo, conducted as part of a whole-school evaluation. It presents the findings of an evaluation of the quality of teaching and learning in Mathematics and makes recommendations for the further development of the teaching of this subject in the school. The evaluation was conducted over two days during which the inspector visited classrooms and observed teaching and learning. The inspector interacted with students and teachers, examined students’ work, and had discussions with the teachers. The inspector reviewed school planning documentation and teachers’ written preparation. Following the evaluation visit, the inspector provided oral feedback on the outcomes of the evaluation to the principal and to the subject teachers.

 

 

Subject provision and whole school support

 

Ursuline College, Sligo supports high quality mathematics education for its students through its timetabling arrangements for the subject. Additional teacher resources are allocated to Mathematics in five out of the six year groups, with two additional teachers in both fifth and sixth years. Also, the time allocation, with five periods at junior cycle and four to six periods at senior cycle is highly suited to requirements. However, the distribution of time sees mathematics lessons occurring on only four of the five days in the majority of junior cycle classes. While not underestimating the complexities of timetabling, it is nonetheless recommended that school management makes every effort to ensure student contact with Mathematics on each of the five days of the school week for each of these year groups.

 

The concurrent timetabling of mathematics classes, within bands at junior cycle and across all class groups at senior cycle, is, commendably, used to provide optimal access for students to the different levels of the subject. Those who find Mathematics particularly challenging are supported through the formation of small class groupings or through supplementary tuition available on a withdrawal basis. It is noteworthy that teachers offer additional voluntary lessons to students of all levels in the final preparation for the Junior and Leaving Certificate examinations.

 

The recent completion of a building project at the school is allowing the opportunity for the development of a dedicated mathematics room. The mathematics teaching team will share access to this room, which will be used to store current and newly acquired resources and will display information on mathematics-related career and further studies options. The team is congratulated on undertaking this new project with enthusiasm and professionalism.

 

This year has seen the introduction of Applied Mathematics to the school’s curriculum. The school and the teacher involved are commended on responding to students’ expressions of interest in this manner.

 

School management facilitates teachers in attending continuing professional development courses. In line with good practice, information and resource materials obtained at such courses are disseminated among all relevant teachers within the mathematics department. Members of the mathematics team are encouraged to renew links with the Mathematics Support Service and the Irish Mathematics Teachers’ Association (IMTA) as a means of obtaining continued support and up-to-date information on developments within the subject. 

 

 

Planning and preparation

 

The mathematics department is coordinated, on a rotating basis, by a member of the mathematics teaching team. Currently the position rotates each year, perhaps not making best use of expertise gained during the settling-in period, and it is therefore recommended that the co-ordinator’s term be extended to two years. 

 

Formal department meetings take place on a number of occasions each year, during scheduled time slots and outside of timetabled hours. Minutes of recent meetings indicate departmental collaboration on the organisation of class groups, the acquisition of resources to support teaching and learning and the development of the subject plan. Informal liaison and discussion among mathematics teachers also takes place on an ongoing basis. 

 

Good progress has been made on the department plan, which has been developed according to School Development Planning Initiative (SDPI) guidelines and includes aims and objectives for mathematics education, a description of the organisation and timetabling of mathematics classes and programmes of work for each year group and level. In order to further progress the commendable work already completed it is recommended that programmes of work be expanded to include learning outcomes for students, related active methodologies, where appropriate, and a clear indication of supporting materials required. 

 

Teachers made individual planning and preparation materials available during the inspection. Included in these materials were detailed schemes of work, considerable quantities of student worksheets and handouts, transparencies prepared for the overhead projector, education plans for students with special educational needs, extensive teacher notes, and large banks of test papers, examination questions and solutions. This level of preparation for teaching is applauded. 

 

As a means of enhancing planning activities, and to further minimise disruption in the transition of students from first to second level, it is recommended that members of the mathematics team develop subject-specific links with sixth-class teachers in feeder primary schools. Such links could promote mutual understanding of approaches, methodologies and expectations at each level and should be a valuable exercise for all teachers involved and, subsequently, for students. 

 

 

Teaching and learning

 

In classrooms visited during the inspection, the content and pace of lessons were appropriate and in line with syllabus requirements. Students were, in all cases, attentive and there was a respectful atmosphere between teachers and students. While teachers engaged principally in whole-class teaching, high levels of attention were given to individual students during periods of student engagement with class work. 

 

Traditional-style teaching predominated, with the teacher presenting work at the board and the students copying down examples or corrections, or completing written exercises. Given the variety in students’ preferred learning styles, and the fact that understanding is enhanced by ‘doing’, it is recommended that teachers work on developing active learning strategies and incorporate these more widely in class. The potential of interactive mathematics software packages should not be underestimated in this regard.

 

In a number of lessons, teachers communicated the day’s learning objectives to the students. This can be very motivating for students and it can encourage a sense of self-awareness with regard to progress and achievement in the subject. It is therefore recommended that all teachers begin lessons by explicitly sharing the lesson objectives and conclude with the marking off of their achievement. 

 

 

Assessment

 

The formal assessment of students’ progress is carried out predominantly through the administration of class tests and term examinations. It is commendable that there is widespread use of common test papers in the mathematics department. First year term examinations at both Christmas and summer are common, as are those within levels (higher and ordinary) throughout junior cycle. This practice is continued as far as possible into senior cycle, including TY. In addition, class tests within year groups and levels are often common.

 

Informal assessment of progress includes the marking of homework and the questioning of students in class. Teachers are encouraged to further explore assessment for learning strategies, and assistance in this regard can be obtained from a number of sources, including staff members in other faculties. A sample of student copybooks examined during the inspection contained relevant and, in some cases, extensive work, which was generally well presented and monitored by teachers.

 

Data on the certificate examinations made available to the school by the inspector provides valuable information for school management and the mathematics team. It is recommended that full use be made of such data for planning and review purposes now and into the future.

 

Progress is reported, in writing, to parents/guardians following term examinations. As a commendable additional support for students sitting the certificate examinations in June, a further report is issued towards the end of the second term. Feedback is also available to parents/guardians at parent-teacher meetings, which are held once in the year for each year group. 

 

Summary of main findings and recommendations

 

The following are the main strengths identified in the evaluation:

 

·         The school supports high quality mathematics education for its students, including access to the different levels, through concurrent timetabling arrangements and the allocation of additional teacher resources in five out of the six year groups. In addition, a dedicated mathematics room is currently being developed.

·         Applied Mathematics has, in response to student demand, been added to the school’s curriculum this year.

·         School management facilitates teachers in attending continuing professional development courses. 

·         The mathematics department is coordinated, on a rotating basis, by a member of the mathematics teaching team. Formal department meetings take place on a number of occasions each year, during scheduled time slots and outside of timetabled hours. Informal collaboration among mathematics teachers also takes place on an ongoing basis. 

·         Progress has been made on the department plan, which has been developed according to SDPI guidelines.

·         In classrooms visited during the inspection, the content and pace of lessons were appropriate and in line with syllabus requirements. Students were, in all cases, attentive and there was a respectful atmosphere between teachers and students. While teachers engaged principally in whole-class teaching, high levels of attention were given to individual students during periods of student engagement with class work. 

·         It is commendable that there is widespread use of common test papers in the mathematics department. 

·         A sample of student copybooks examined during the inspection contained relevant and, in some cases, extensive work, which was generally well presented and monitored by teachers.  

 

As a means of building on these strengths and to address areas for development, the following key recommendations are made:

 

·         For some junior cycle classes, mathematics lessons occur on only four of the five days of the week. While not underestimating the complexities of timetabling, it is nonetheless recommended that school management makes every effort to ensure student contact with Mathematics on each of the five days of the school week for each of these year groups.

·         It is recommended that programmes of work be expanded to include learning outcomes for students, related active methodologies, where appropriate, and a clear indication of supporting materials required. 

·         As a means of enhancing planning activities, and to further minimise disruption in the transition of students from first to second level, it is recommended that members of the mathematics team develop subject-specific links with sixth-class teachers in feeder primary schools. 

·         Given the variety in students’ preferred learning styles, and the fact that understanding is enhanced by ‘doing’, it is recommended that teachers work on developing active learning strategies and incorporate these more widely in class. 

·         It is recommended that all teachers begin lessons by explicitly sharing the lesson objectives with students and conclude with the marking off of their achievement. 

·         It is recommended that full use be made of certificate examination data for planning and review purposes now and into the future.

 

Post-evaluation meetings were held with the teachers of Mathematics and with the principal at the conclusion of the evaluation when the draft findings and recommendations of the evaluation were presented and discussed.