An Roinn Oideachais agus Eolaíochta

Department of Education and Science

  

Subject Inspection of English

REPORT

 

Saint Joseph’s Secondary School

Ballybunion, County Kerry

Roll number: 61220I

  

Date of inspection: 24 April 2007

Date of issue of report: 6 December 2007

 

Subject inspection report

Subject provision and whole school support

Planning and preparation

Teaching and learning

Assessment

Summary of main findings and recommendations

 

Report on the Quality of Learning and Teaching in English

 

 

Subject inspection report

 

This report has been written following a subject inspection in Saint Joseph’s Secondary School. It presents the findings of an evaluation of the quality of teaching and learning in English and makes recommendations for the further development of the teaching of this subject in the school. The evaluation was conducted over one day during which the inspector visited classrooms and observed teaching and learning. The inspector interacted with students and teachers, examined students’ work, and had discussions with the teachers. The inspector reviewed school planning documentation and teachers’ written preparation. Following the evaluation visit, the inspector provided oral feedback on the outcomes of the evaluation to the principal and subject teachers.  The board of management was given an opportunity to comment in writing on the findings and recommendations of the report; a response was not received from the board.

 

 

Subject provision and whole school support

 

Saint Joseph’s Secondary School is a co-educational school. First-year and second-year English classes have four English lessons per week. This is adequate provision. Third-year, fifth-year and sixth-year classes are provided with five English lessons per week. This is good provision. All English classes, apart from those in first year, are concurrently timetabled. This is good practice, allowing for ease of student movement between classes, should this prove to be necessary. There is a student-support room which is used to support students in literacy and in other areas of their school life. This is most worthwhile. English teachers are not currently provided with baserooms. It is, however, planned that this would be the case in the coming academic year. This is a very positive development and is to be encouraged, as it will facilitate the storage of English resources by teachers, along with the development of an ‘English atmosphere’ through which students’ experiences of the subject can be further enhanced. English classes retain their teachers from second year to third year and from fifth year to sixth year. This is good practice. English teachers are assigned to levels and cycles on a rotational basis. This is worthwhile.

 

First-year English classes are of mixed ability. All new first-year students participate in assessment tests prior to enrolment. These tests facilitate the identification of students in need of additional literacy support. Further information is garnered from psychological reports, contact with students’ primary schools and students’ parents. Those who have been identified in the initial testing process for first-year students are retested in September of first year. Students in other year groups are streamed into higher level or ordinary level classes. Students are assigned to these classes based on the assessment of their present subject teacher, along with input from the guidance counsellor, their parent or guardian and the new teacher to whom they are to be assigned in second year or fifth year. In addition to these arrangements, fifth-year students’ performances in the Junior Certificate examination are also taken into account. If students wish to change levels for the state examinations, they discuss this with their subject teacher and the guidance counsellor. A note is then sent by the guidance counsellor to their parent, this is signed by the parent and then by the student and their teacher before the student moves to a new class. This is sound practice.

 

A library is maintained in the school’s student-support room. Students may access the library during lunchtime. Teachers encourage students to use the library and to write book reports and reviews on the texts they have read. The English department hopes to increase the range of books available in the library over time. The school is encouraged to support the department in this endeavour. The development of a departmental library policy as part of the subject plan is another strategy which the department should explore. This would provide an opportunity for teachers to discuss the library as part of an overall ‘reading plan’ to encourage reading in all year groups. Potentially useful ideas in this regard would include the development of ‘cosy corners’ and the purchase of readalong texts and graphic novels for reluctant readers. A handout is provided for parents of students with literacy difficulties on the subject of shared reading. It is suggested that a possible area for the English department to investigate is the creation of a paired-reading programme at lunchtimes for first-year students with literacy difficulties, possibly with the involvement of some senior cycle students.

 

The school has a dedicated audio-visual room but access for English classes is somewhat limited. It is recommended that provision for audio-visual facilities for English classes should be increased. This is particularly important in the context of the central role played by film in the Leaving Certificate English course, but, beyond this, the impact of the judicious use of audio-visual resources in junior cycle classes should not be underestimated. The anticipated introduction of baserooms for English teachers should greatly facilitate the expansion of audio-visual facilities in the English department. The assigning of such facilities to either one teacher’s room in the department or, ideally, the incremental development of such resources in each English baseroom, would be most worthwhile.

 

The school has a computer room and computers are also provided in the student-support room. There is limited access to the computer room and this is managed through the use of a booking timetable. A laptop is also used by different departments in the school and, in the very near future, a laptop will be provided for the use of the English department. Classrooms have been connected for wireless broadband internet access. The English subject plan aspires towards the production of a selection of work on computer by first-year and second-year students, dependent on the availability of the computer room. This is worthwhile, as is the practice of teachers downloading material for English classes from the internet in order to compensate for students’ lack of access to information and communication technology (ICT). The English department is encouraged to continue to expand its practice with ICT wherever possible, particularly with regard to students’ use of ICT with homework and classwork. Potential areas for exploration include the adoption of webquests for use with students’ project work and word-processing packages to increase students’ awareness of the drafting and redrafting process which is central to all good writing.

 

New or substitute teachers are provided with a handbook about the school and are mentored by the deputy principal. There is also an arrangement whereby the new teacher may observe other teachers’ classroom practice. All of this is positive.

 

English teachers have attended in-service training courses in the past and contact has been made with the Special Education Support Service (SESS). The English department is encouraged to pursue opportunities for continuing professional development through both the SESS and the Second Level Support Service (SLSS). This professional development could be focused either on areas specific to English or on more general educational areas, for example, differentiated teaching methodologies. Teachers report that material from courses attended by members of the English department is shared with the other members of the department on an informal basis. This is positive and the department is encouraged to place this practice on a more formal basis through its inclusion in the subject plan. Practice is also shared with other schools in the locality through informal links.

 

 

Planning and preparation

 

A subject co-ordinator for English has been appointed. One formal meeting of the English team is held per term and these meetings are supplemented by further informal meetings. Minutes of departmental meetings have been kept. This is good practice and should be continued. The school is to be complimented on the generous allocation made for departmental meetings, each of which is of three periods’ duration. Large files of material appropriate to the study of English in both the Junior Certificate examination and the Leaving Certificate examination have been gathered and stored by the English department.

 

There is a well-developed English subject plan. This has been created using ICT. This is positive, allowing for ease of revision as the plan is evaluated and refined each year. Common yearly plans have been developed. A particular feature of the plans is the focus which is maintained, not only on content to be taught, but also on learning goals to be achieved by students. The English department is to be complimented on its commitment to developing the subject plan. The department is encouraged to maintain and expand the focus on learning objectives for students which is already a part of the plan. An addition which might also be considered, in the section of the plan setting out methodologies to be used in the teaching of the subject, is the integration of the language and literature elements of the syllabus in both classwork and homework. Potential areas for further exploration through the subject plan might include the linking of the current, very good, common plans to specific timelines, the analysis of state examination results and uptake versus national norms, the use of ICT in the teaching and learning of English and the development of an assessment for learning policy in English. Information on the latter area can be garnered from the website of the National Council for Curriculum and Assessment (NCCA) at www.ncca.ie. The department’s already reflective attitude to its own work is, however, acknowledged in making these suggestions.

 

A range of extracurricular, co-curricular and cross-curricular activities are organised for students by members of the English department. Among these are included visits to the Irish Film Society, theatre workshops and visiting speakers. The efforts of teachers in these areas are to be praised.

 

Teachers are conscious of the need to facilitate movement of students between levels when choosing the poems to be studied in senior cycle. This is commendable. Students in higher level junior cycle classes study one novel for each year of the course and this too is very worthwhile. There is limited variation of texts in junior and senior cycle. It is recommended that English teachers pursue greater variation of text choice in both cycles, within the requirements of the syllabus. This should be done not only in order to ensure that texts suit class context and interest, but also as a means of enhancing and expanding their own professional experiences. A useful resource in choosing texts for junior cycle classes can be accessed at www.childrensbooksireland.com. The school is encouraged to support the English department in expanding the range and variation of texts studied in both cycles. Currently, the study of two texts is undertaken for the comparative element of the ordinary level Leaving Certificate course. It is recommended that the study of three comparative texts be undertaken in all classes studying for the Leaving Certificate examination, as is required by the syllabus. This provision should also be set down as an element in the English subject plan.

 

The school has a special educational needs policy. This is worthwhile and the school is encouraged to continue to maintain a reflective attitude towards the policy in the future. The literacy-support programme is organised on the basis of individual and small-group withdrawal. It is suggested that the possibility of increasing the flexibility of this programme through the adoption of some co-operative teaching might be examined in the coming year.

 

There are good links between the special educational needs department and the English department. This is aided by the fact that the learning-support/resource teacher is also a member of the English department. Informal meetings also serve to enhance communication between the two departments. A very positive step has been the development of a range of resources for English by the learning-support/resource teacher.  Individual education plans (IEPs) have begun to be developed. Time has been allocated for meetings regarding IEPs for the first time this year. All of this is commendable. The school is encouraged to continue to develop the IEP process.

 

 

Teaching and learning

 

A good standard of teaching was observed during the inspection. Planning was presented in all lessons. Objectives were clear in all lessons. Particularly good practice was evident in one instance, where the teacher began by clearly enunciating the objective of the lesson for students. Teachers were universally affirming of students. There was a good relationship between teachers and students and good classroom management was evident in all classes.

 

A wide range of resources was used in English lessons to support the teaching and learning process. The emphasis on visual resources in a number of lessons was particularly praiseworthy. The use of these resources facilitates increased engagement on the part of students who are less motivated by purely verbal presentations. The requirement by the English department that students purchase a dictionary and thesaurus as part of their English materials is most worthwhile. The impact of these texts might be further added to through the explicit teaching of dictionary skills in English lessons and students’ own use of a dictionary and thesaurus as part of everyday classroom practice. Teachers are to be praised for their imaginative use of varied resources in English lessons.

 

Language was consistently highlighted in English lessons. In one instance, a variety of features of language were pointed out to students during the examination of a poem. They were then expected to analyse language choices made by the author. In another lesson, students were encouraged to develop their use of descriptive language in connection with a poster of Newgrange. The strong emphasis placed on the importance of language in English lessons is to be praised.

 

Reading featured in all classes, with students in one lesson being asked to read out a descriptive passage they had written. A further example of good practice was the initial reading of a play, with students adopting particular roles, thus adding to a sense of the theatrical nature of the piece in question. In another lesson, the teacher read a poem and asked students for their initial impressions of the piece, with their ideas being further developed on the blackboard. This was worthwhile and might have been added to still more through the use of group work or pair work.

 

There was some use of differentiated methodologies during the inspection. In one instance, students were exhorted to aid their partners in adding to a descriptive passage they were building during the lesson. In general, however, the English department is encouraged to pursue a more widespread adoption of differentiated teaching and learning strategies such as pair work and group work. This will allow for greater shifts in methodology and pacing during lessons, while also allowing teachers to cater more specifically to the needs of individual students.

 

There was evidence of the integration of the language and literature elements of the syllabuses in a majority of lessons. The use of ‘real-world’ written exercises was positive, along with the student council’s role in creating a school magazine. There was some evidence of the integration of the language and literature elements of the syllabuses in students’ homework. English teachers are encouraged to further expand their use of these strategies in setting students’ homework. The assigning of genre exercises in connection with texts studied by students should prove particularly useful as a means of increasing students’ engagement with written tasks. The further investigation of means by which students’ genre exercises could be ‘published’ through the use of ICT, the display of folders or portfolios, the development of class compendiums or the public display of particular exercises in classrooms, are all areas which would further aid in the advancement of students’ appreciation of texts and the nature of writing in general.

 

Students were engaged in English lessons and displayed a good understanding of the texts they were studying. This was demonstrated by the facility with which they answered teachers’ questions on aspects of language and other areas connected with these texts. The promotion of text-marking by students on the part of teachers as a means of ensuring that students remained ‘on task’ was positive and teachers are encouraged to continue to develop their use of similar Directed Activities Related to Texts (DARTs) in the future.

 

There was evidence of the development of a print-rich environment in most lessons and teachers are to be praised for their efforts in this area. Displays of students’ work, along with posters on grammar, featured in classrooms occupied by English teachers. The English department is encouraged to further expand this area of its practice, setting out the creation and maintenance of a print-rich environment as a key aspiration in the English subject plan. The anticipated provision of baserooms for English teachers should serve to further increase the opportunities afforded to English teachers to enhance their practice in this area.

 

 

Assessment

 

Appropriate amounts of homework were regularly assigned and corrected. In all cases the use of formative, comment-based assessment was in evidence. In a number of instances, this form of assessment might have been expanded somewhat in order to further inform the development of students’ skills in English.

 

Examinations are organised for students at each midterm, at the end of each term and at the end of the year. These examinations are formally organised for those year groups which will participate in the state examinations. They are informal in the case of non-examination classes, apart from the end-of-year examination, which is formally organised. A percentage of the marks for these examinations is awarded for students’ classwork and homework. Teachers are also free to hold occasional class tests should they deem these to be useful. Mock examinations are organised for third-year and sixth-year students. A potentially useful area for the English department to explore is that of teachers moderating each others’ marking of students’ work from time to time. Provision is made during examinations for those students who have applied for the Reasonable Accommodations in Certificate Examinations (RACE) scheme. This is good practice. It is suggested that the possibility of setting common examinations or common components of examinations for different classes in the same year group might be investigated. Such provision would allow for the comparison of students’ performance across a year cohort. In making this suggestion, however, it is recognised that the current arrangement of class groupings, along with the size of the school, may legislate against such practice. Students in receipt of literacy support are generally retested at Christmas and again at the end of the academic year.

 

Reports on students’ progress are sent to parents at every midterm break, at the end of each term and at the end of the year. There is one parent-teacher meeting for each year group once per year. Contacts are also maintained with parents through use of students’ journals and parents are also contacted by phone, should the need arise. These arrangements are worthwhile.

 

 

Summary of main findings and recommendations

 

The following are the main strengths identified in the evaluation:

 

  • A good relationship was evident between teachers and students.
  • Teachers are incorporating the use of ICT into their practice. The English department is encouraged to continue to develop its use of ICT.
  •  Baserooms are planned for English teachers in the next academic year. This is most positive.
  • There is a well-developed subject plan. The department is to be complimented on its commitment to developing the subject plan.
  • Good, informal, links have been established between the English department and the learning-support department. This is worthwhile and these links should continue to be developed.
  • There are three formal departmental meetings per year of three lessons’ duration each. The school is to be complimented on its provision for these meetings. Minutes are kept of meetings and a co-ordinator has been appointed.
  • There was a good focus on language in English classes.
  • Pair work and active methodologies were used during the inspection. The expansion of the use of these and other differentiated methodologies should be pursued.
  • Learning was evident in all classes.
  • Homework was regularly assigned to an appropriate level.
  • There was some evidence of the integration of the language and literature elements of the syllabus in students’ homework. This was positive and the English department is encouraged to include this as a key strategy in the subject plan.

 

 

As a means of building on these strengths and to address areas for development, the following key recommendations are made:

 

  • Provision for the availability of audio-visual facilities in English lessons should be increased.
  • Three comparative texts should be studied in ordinary level Leaving Certificate classes.
  • Greater variation of texts in junior cycle and in senior cycle should be pursued by the English department.

 

Post-evaluation meetings were held with the teachers of English and with the principal at the conclusion of the evaluation when the draft findings and recommendations of the evaluation were presented and discussed.