
An Roinn
Oideachais agus Eolaíochta
Department of Education and
Science
Curriculum
Implementation Evaluation:
Science and
Mathematics 2007
REPORT
Saint Colman’s Boys National School
Percival Street, Kanturk,
County Cork
Uimhir rolla: 14052V
Date of inspection: 26
march 2007
Date of issue of report:
6 December 2007
1. School
background and context
2. Provision
and use of resources
Quality of school planning in Science and in
Mathematics
3.1 Whole-school
planning in Science
3.2 Whole-school
planning in Mathematics
4. Quality
of learning and teaching in Science and Mathematics
4.1 Quality
of learning and teaching in Science
4.2 Quality
of learning and teaching in Mathematics
4.3 Quality
of support for pupils in Mathematics
5.
Summary
of findings and recommendations for the further development of Science and Mathematics
The
Inspectorate of the Department of Education and Science undertook an evaluation
of the learning and teaching in Science and Mathematics in a sample of schools
nationally. This evaluation was the third in a series of thematic evaluations
of aspects of the primary curriculum and was part of an ongoing review of
curriculum implementation in primary schools. The purpose of this evaluation is
to provide information on the extent of curriculum implementation in Science.
The evaluation will focus on the teaching and learning in Science and
Mathematics and on the quality of pupils’ achievement in these curricular
areas. This evaluation identifies and affirms good practice, and makes
recommendations for teaching and the enhancement of pupils’ learning
experiences and levels of achievement. The board of management of the school
was given an opportunity to comment on the findings and recommendations of the
report; the board chose to accept the report without response.
Two
inspectors were involved in the evaluation in St. Colman’s boys’ national
school. The evaluation involved the observation of teaching and learning in
different class settings, a review of planning and policy documents, and an
evaluation of the progress of pupils, including those receiving supplementary
teaching in Mathematics. A school questionnaire was administered and structured
interviews with the principal and class teachers were conducted. Drawing on the
evaluations undertaken in the schools nationally, the Inspectorate will publish
a composite report on the quality of teaching and learning of Science in
primary schools.
St. Colman’s
BNS is situated in the North Cork town of
The school
building is well maintained and emphasis is placed on utilising space
productively wherever possible. As the classrooms are small, staff is restricted in its efforts to deliver a quality
curriculum on a consistent basis. The board of management has documented a
proposal for amalgamation of the boys’ and girls’ schools to the Department in
the light of the inadequacy of facilities and the desirability of
co-education. The board feels that the needs of the pupils can best be
served by providing a new school on a
The social
and educational welfare of the pupils admirably underpins the work of the
staff. To this end, the school seeks to educate the whole child and to
prepare them spiritually, morally, physically and academically for life.
Co-operation, respect and a strong sense of community are encouraged. Also, a
healthy attitude to sport is promoted.
The previous
school report was written in 1999 and the staff has
made a determined effort to develop further good practice in addressing the
highlighted issues.
The purchase,
storage and the replacement of resources for Science is creditably identified
in the school plan and curriculum grants have been used judiciously to purchase
equipment. The school has sufficient resources to support hands-on learning
activities in the various strands of the Science curriculum. Equipment and
materials are stored in a central location, from which teachers borrow as the
need arises. A Science coordinator has been appointed and she is responsible
for the ordering, auditing and managing of the Science equipment and materials.
She exhibits an admirable enthusiasm for her duties. She is intent on
developing Science on a continuous basis throughout the school. In close
cooperation with staff, she has produced a comprehensive resource folder for
Science that includes a detailed audit of the local environment and a detailed
inventory of equipment currently available in the school.
Staff has identified the locality as a productive resource for
Science. A number of trails in the town have been researched and further work
in this area is ongoing. A school wormery is a
feature of the school environment. Current restrictions of space limit the
staff’s endeavours to exploit the potential of the school environs to develop
the pupils’ knowledge and skills. Equally, the old and cumbersome state
of pupil desks do not allow for the cultivation of group work in an activity
based setting.
Information
and Communication Technology (ICT) is recognised by staff as a valuable
resource in the teaching of Science. Its potential is exploited to varying
degrees by staff. It forms a central focus of the work being undertaken by some
teachers but in the main its use is limited. Management has identified the lack
of a broadband facility, dated machines and a limited amount of software as
factors that inhibit the further development of this valuable resource.
In a worthy
effort to develop their skills, staff has participated
in a number of professional development activities. These include attendance at
inservice days and participation in summer courses.
The staff has availed of the services of a cuiditheoir for Science, and this resulted in reviewing and
updating the school plan. Visitors to the school are regularly entertained and
their additional knowledge is productively utilised to enrich the
pupils’ knowledge and to develop the teachers’ skill base. It
is recommended that staff continues in its efforts to access useful training in
Science and that the board of management encourages them in this worthy endeavour.
Parents are supportive
of school initiatives in the assembly of materials for a variety of science
initiatives.
The board of
management recently appointed a co-ordinator for Mathematics, who in
collaboration with the principal and staff has undertaken much impressive work
in relation to the provision of materials and planning for this area. She has
carefully sourced a wide range of very useful reference materials relating to
the various strands of the curriculum and has effectively organised them in a
comprehensive resource file. An audit of the resources available throughout the
school has been completed and the results are usefully displayed in the staff
room. It is evident that a good variety of mathematical equipment and games are
provided in both mainstream and support contexts. Some mathematical trails have
been developed and further work in this aspect of the curriculum is planned.
The prominent display of materials, mathematical posters and charts in many mainstream
and support classrooms greatly enhances the learning environment in these
classrooms. Many high quality teacher made charts, designed to support pupils’
current learning were noted during the evaluation. This is commended. During
the evaluation, skilful use was made of a range of resources including ICT, to
present and consolidate mathematical concepts. It is particularly commendable
that concrete materials were used very effectively in many classrooms. In the
interest of promoting further improvement in pupil learning, it is recommended
that existing good practice be maintained and extended through a regular
updating of resources and the identification of whole-school strategies
designed to optimise their use. In particular, it is recommended that in some
classrooms a greater emphasis should be placed on the use of manipulatives to facilitate hands-on interactive teaching
approaches.
The teachers collaborate closely with each other and have
succeeded in creating an environment that nurtures innovation and encourages
the contributions of all staff members. In this context, all staff
members contributed to the development of the school plan for Science.
The plan was duly ratified by the board of management and was made available to
parents. A period for review is set bi-annually. The plan is
guided by documents provided by the PCSP and INTO. The school plan outlines the
knowledge the children will acquire and the skills that will be developed.
Commendably, the plan outlines how the science programme promotes a balance
between the acquisition of knowledge and skills. Further attention needs to be
given to developing a system for the recording of pupils’ progress and
development of skills and knowledge from class to class. The plan should also
identify increased opportunities for pupils to engage in designing and making
activities. Staff also needs to clarify the role
of the text-book in the teaching of Science on a whole-school basis. The four
strands of the science curriculum are covered over a two-year period. While
sufficient time is allocated for Science, consideration should be given to
exploring a greater range of topics in the strand Environmental Awareness
and Care.
A staff
co-ordinator for Science has been appointed and she has undertaken commendable
work in developing and reviewing the school plan. However, no specific
responsibility has been assigned to her for the monitoring of its
implementation. The role of curriculum co-ordinator should be extended further
to include the elements of monitoring, implementation and evaluation. The
potential for the school’s immediate environment is explored successfully and
this is an area that is targeted for future development as a valuable resource
for pupil learning. Staff recognises the importance of
using pupils’ own perspectives as a starting point for scientific activity, and
the key methodologies also feature. Structures are in place at staff meetings
that allows for regular review and discussion and when needs are identified, an
action plan is devised to ensure these needs are addressed. Staff is advised to record the minutes of these meetings on
a formal basis to ensure that management and staff are informed of current and
future development needs.
Teacher
observation, teacher designed tasks and tests and work samples are the
identified as assessment strategies in Science. While Science is not featured
in the school’s report card to parents, this practice is currently under
review.
Commendable
whole-school work in relation to the teaching and learning of Mathematics has
been undertaken and the teachers deserve much credit for their dedication. They
have collaboratively developed a worthwhile whole-school plan for Mathematics
and this was reviewed on a school planning day in March 2006. This plan clearly
draws attention to key aspects of the curriculum such as pupil skills to be
developed, the learning goals for each class level and approaches and
methodologies. It provides many useful guidelines for teaching and learning and
there is much evidence of effective implementation of the plan. However, it is
recommended that the approaches to assessment, record keeping and the provision
of differentiated approaches should be reviewed with a view to extending
existing good practice. Such a review should aim to provide additional guidelines
for classroom practice and further develop assessment for learning on a whole
school basis. It is also recommended that the impact of whole-school planning
on pupil learning should be regularly reviewed by the development of specific
action plans to be implemented within agreed time frames. In this context, it
is recommended that the role of the mathematics co-ordinator should be extended
to include monitoring the implementation of the curriculum, and that key
decisions taken at staff meetings should be systematically recorded and copied
to all members. The DES publication Looking
at our schools is designed to support this review process.
Evidence was
provided to confirm that the board of management and staff have taken
appropriate steps to develop policies in line with the provisions in Children
First: National Guidelines for the Protection and Welfare of Children (Department
of Health and Children, 1999, updated issue May 2004) and Child Protection
Guidelines for Primary Schools (Department of Education and Science, April
2001). Evidence was also provided to confirm that the board of management has
adopted and implemented the policies. A designated liaison person has been
appointed in line with the requirements of the Departmental guidelines.
All teachers
prepare effective individual long and short-term plans for their classes in
Mathematics and in Science, and detailed monthly progress records are
maintained. These plans are characterised by high standards of detail and relevance.
The teachers are commended for accessing a wide variety of source material in
the planning of their programmes. Objectives therein are duly referenced to the
school plan and to Primary School Curriculum (1999). Commendable
reference is also made to key methodologies, to linkage and integration and to
the development of pupil skills. At a variety of class levels, impressive work
has been undertaken in planning key aspects of the work such as mathematical
language, methodologies, strategies for estimation, problem solving and
memorisation of number facts. In recognition of the spiral nature of pupils’
learning and in the interests of developing continuity throughout the school,
it is suggested the monthly progress records be used by the teaching staff to
ensure progression in the programme covered with the pupils. This
activity would also contribute productively to the review of classroom planning
and to the implementation of the curriculum at different class levels.
Science
lessons were observed in the four strands, with the strand Energy and Forces
having a Designing and Making focus. The quality of teaching was very
good at all class levels. Impressive examples of differentiated teaching and
integrated learning processes are features of classroom practice. Teachers give
clear explanation to pupils, present content clearly and provide appropriate
and structured learning activities. Lessons are carefully structured,
well-paced and developed. In almost all classes pupils’ ideas are elicited at
the start of the lesson and their ideas are successfully used to develop
understanding. Commendable attempts are made to relate the activities to
everyday situations that have relevance to the pupils. Teachers employ a
variety of methodologies effectively in the lessons, most notably: working with
concrete materials, talk and discussion, demonstration, experimentation and investigative
work. Teachers are skilful in supporting pupils to develop higher-order
thinking skills and pupils are suitably challenged. In some of the lessons
observed, teachers allow pupils to devise their own way of working, choosing
resources and problem-solving in groups. Regular engagement in open-ended
investigations would further promote this worthwhile activity. Attractive
learning environments are created with the provision of nature and
investigation tables, samples of pupils’ work and illustrative materials, and
this practice is to be encouraged on a whole-school basis. However the lack of
sufficient space in a number of rooms does not allow for adequate display
purposes.
Pupils
exhibit considerable enthusiasm for Science. They are suitably challenged by
the activities, and scientific language is used appropriately during discussion
within group activity. Pupils’ scientific skills are developed effectively and,
indeed, a number of pupils demonstrate an impressive competence in evaluating
evidence and in drawing conclusions from their investigations and experiments.
They have a clear understanding of what constitutes a fair test. Work is
carefully recorded in copies. Teachers support pupils regularly to develop
their skills in prediction, experimentation and recording. Appropriate
materials are provided in Designing and Making activities and the pupils
beneficially undertake the practical work in groups. However, the pupils would
benefit from an improved emphasis on the development of the skills required in
the planning of the activity.
As part of
this evaluation, two sets of tasks were administered to the pupils in a number
of classrooms. The first set of tasks was used to assess the pupils’ conceptual
knowledge. In the strand Energy and Forces, the majority of the pupils
demonstrated mastery of the concepts tested in Forces, in Light, in
Heat, and in Magnetism and Electricity. A few pupils demonstrated mastery
of the concept tested in Sound. In the strand Materials almost
all the pupils mastered the concept of Properties and Characteristics of
Materials, while a few had developed mastery of the concept of Materials
and Change. In Environmental Awareness and Care fewer than half the
pupils achieved mastery in Environmental Awareness and in Caring for
the Environment. However the majority of the pupils mastered the concept
assessed in Science and the Environment.
The second
set of tasks was used to assess the pupils’ procedural knowledge. This test
proved to be more demanding for certain pupils: a small number achieved mastery
in the senior classes and fewer than half the pupils mastered the skills in the
junior classes. The majority of pupils achieved mastery of procedural knowledge
in the middle classes.
In general,
pupils are making good progress in Science. Arising from the assessment tests
it appears that there is scope for development in cultivating pupils’
procedural knowledge. Overall the pupils achieve a creditable mastery of
conceptual knowledge, notwithstanding some difficulties experienced in certain
strand units.
Very good
practice in the teaching and learning of Mathematics was observed during the
evaluation. A commendable emphasis was placed on mental mathematics. A wide
range of strategies was used in many classrooms to enable pupils memorise
number facts in an enjoyable manner. Much effective linkage of number work with
other strands such as measures, shape and space was noted. Pupils were given
worthwhile opportunities to consolidate concepts learned and apply them to a
variety of other contexts based on their own experiences. In many classrooms a
very good emphasis was placed on talk and discussion and on enabling pupils to
use mathematical language appropriately. An emphasis on a problem solving
approach and on developing pupils’ estimation skills featured prominently in
many of the lessons observed. Very effective integration with other areas of
the curriculum such as SESE was also noted. While many of the lessons observed
placed a commendable emphasis on enabling pupils acquire concepts through
hands-on approaches, there is a need to further develop the use of these
approaches in some classrooms, particularly in the context of addressing
pupils’ diverse learning needs.
Many pupils
display good knowledge and understanding of key mathematical concepts. They
respond well to oral questioning and display high levels of motivation and
engagement during lessons. A very good emphasis is placed on encouraging them
to record their work neatly and in an orderly fashion, and their work is
regularly monitored. A variety of approaches to assessment was noted during the
evaluation. Standardised tests are administered. Good work on the development of
files to track pupil progress from one class level to the next was observed. At
a variety of class levels, teacher-designed tests are regularly administered to
monitor individual pupils’ acquisition of key concepts and skills, and parents
are given the opportunity to view their children’s work. It is recommended that
this good practice should now be further developed on a whole-school basis with
a view to extending the emphasis on assessment for learning and further
ensuring that assessment data is systematically used to inform planning and the
provision of differentiated teaching and learning approaches. The importance of
giving pupils feedback for improvement was beneficially highlighted and
discussed during the evaluation.
Supplementary
teaching is provided in both numeracy and literacy.
However there has been a significant turnover in support staff this year. The
special needs team currently consists of one full-time learning-support
teacher, three part-time resource teachers and three special needs assistants.
One resource teacher provides twelve hours teaching in this school and is
shared with two nearby schools. Another teacher provides seven hours resource
teaching and is also shared with nearby schools. A third teacher who provides
language support for foreign national pupils also caters for the special needs
of a small number of pupils for whom resource hours were recently sanctioned.
The support teachers and special needs assistants work diligently to provide
support for the pupils in their care and are commended for their dedication.
The efforts of the principal and teachers to provide a coherent special
education needs team are acknowledged. However, concerns were expressed during
the evaluation regarding fragmentation of provision for pupils with special
needs and advice was given. It is recommended a meeting should be held with
local principals on an annual basis with a view to minimising fragmentation of
special needs posts.
In keeping
with good practice the staff has formulated a
worthwhile whole-school policy document on learning support and special
education needs and this has been ratified by the board of management. This
policy provides a sound basis for the development of the support service.
During the evaluation many commendable planning and well-structured teaching
approaches were observed in support contexts. The support teachers collaborate
with mainstream teachers and regular communication with parents and other
professionals is also maintained. They carefully prepare individual education
plans (IEPs) for pupils in receipt of supplementary
teaching. These plans are based on the pupils’ identified learning needs and,
arising from this evidence, priority learning areas and related learning
targets are clearly outlined. Ongoing focused short-term planning and progress
records are maintained. However, it is recommended that a statement of current
level of performance should be consistently recorded in precise terms in all IEPs. It is also recommended that existing best practice of
formally reviewing the IEP at the end each of the term of instruction and
sharing the information with parents should be extended.
Most pupils
in receipt of supplementary teaching are withdrawn individually but some are
withdrawn in small groups. During the instructional term, a number of pupils
were transferred from learning-support to a resource teacher when additional
resource hours were sanctioned for them. It is recommended that the current
emphasis on withdrawal should be reduced and that school policy should be
reviewed in the context of circular 24/03. This circular clarifies the
flexibility that schools might employ in the allocation of resources so that
they are deployed in a manner that best meets the needs of the pupils with
special needs. In this context it is advised that models of in-class support
within mainstream classrooms should be developed in collaboration with the
special education support services.
The following are the main strengths identified in the
evaluation:
As a means of building on these strengths and to
address areas for development, the following key recommendations are made:
Post-evaluation meetings were held with the staff and
the chairperson of the board of management where the draft findings and
recommendations of the evaluation were presented and discussed.
The Inspectorate
of the Department of Education and Science wishes to acknowledge the
contributions made by the principal and teachers during the course of the
evaluation. It is hoped that this report will be directly useful to the school
as a basis for review and development of practice at school level. It is
anticipated that the composite report on the quality of teaching and learning
of Science will serve as a valuable reference at system level and will inform
the further development of policy and provision for the teaching of Science.