An Roinn Oideachais agus Eolaíochta

Department of Education and Science

 

Subject Inspection of Physical Education

REPORT

 

St. Joseph’s Secondary School

Tulla, County Clare

Roll number: 62020F

 

Date of inspection: 20 March 2007

Date of issue of report:  17 January 2008

 

 

 

Subject inspection report

Subject provision and whole school support

Planning and preparation

Teaching and learning

Assessment

Summary of main findings and recommendations

 

 

Report on the Quality of Learning and Teaching in Physical Education

 

 

Subject inspection report

 

This report has been written following a subject inspection conducted as part of a whole school evaluation in St. Joseph’s Secondary School. It presents the findings of an evaluation of the quality of teaching and learning in Physical Education and makes recommendations for the further development of the teaching of this subject in the school. The evaluation was conducted over one day during which the inspector visited classrooms and observed teaching and learning. The inspector interacted with students and teachers, examined students’ work, and had discussions with the teachers. The inspector reviewed school planning documentation and teachers’ written preparation. Following the evaluation visit, the inspector provided oral feedback on the outcomes of the evaluation to the principal and subject teachers.

 

Subject provision and whole school support

 

St Joseph’s is a co-educational voluntary secondary school catering for 203 boys and 201 girls from the local environs. The Physical Education department consists of two teachers, both of whom are qualified in the subject. Management is commended for its support for the continuing professional development of staff and the Physical Education teachers have recently attended in-service for the revised Junior Cycle Physical Education Syllabus.

 

Physical Education is a core subject at junior cycle with each class receiving one double period per week. Management is commended for its recent decision to change the timetable provision from two single periods to one double period per week for junior cycle Physical Education. This new provision is in line with circular M15/05 and affords students sufficient time to engage fully with the subject matter. Transition Year students receive one double period of Physical Education every other week which alternates with an Arts module. There is currently no Physical Education provision for fifth or sixth-year students. However, fifth and sixth-year students are timetabled for one double period of games per week. Games are not a curricular subject and it is therefore recommended that games are no longer timetabled within the school day. However, the provision of double periods for each class group should be maintained but timetabled instead for Physical Education with the appropriately qualified teachers. A good quality Physical Education programme strives to provide students with an opportunity to study all aspects underpinning involvement in physical activity, exercise and sport. It is therefore recommended that management review the current provision for Physical Education at senior cycle and aim towards providing a programme that has breadth, depth, coherence and relevance to the needs of the students. The Department of Education and Science (DES) Rules and Programmes for Secondary Schools recommends that all students should have access to two hours of high quality Physical Education per week, and management is encouraged to work towards this level of provision.

 

It is important to stress that support and provision for extra-curricular games is encouraged and commended. These activities provide opportunities for students to apply their learning in Physical Education to an area of activity that interests them and for which they may possess a particular talent. Extra-curricular activities also provide a positive social outlet for students whether as part of a competitive team or through engaging in recreational physical activities with their peers.

 

The facilities available for Physical Education include a small indoor hall and a small outdoor hard court area. There is also a grass area, which is sometimes used but this pitch is restrictive for many of the activities on the syllabus. The Physical Education department endeavours to provide a high quality programme despite there being considerable pressure to accommodate all students due to the restrictions imposed by the current facilities. This is highly commended. The school has acquired ten acres of land and has identified the development of a full size playing pitch as its immediate priority. Plans have also been submitted for a new school including a full size sports hall on this site. The school is commended for its pro-active and long-term vision for the educational needs of the community.

 

A requisition system is in place for the purchase of resources to support the teaching and learning of the subject. This system is reported to be working well and the small storeroom is well stocked with sufficient equipment to support the teaching of the Physical Education programme. The school is broadband enabled and the Physical Education department has access to the school computer room and data-projector upon request. It is recommended that a whiteboard be installed in the sports hall to facilitate the Physical Education department to highlight key concepts and tasks as well as to record student responses and key performance indicators.

 

The school supports a wide range of extra-curricular activities including hurling, Gaelic football, camógie, ladies football, basketball, soccer and athletics. Many members of the teaching staff, including the Physical Education teachers, are involved in the organisation and coaching of these activities. The provision and support for students’ involvement in these activities is highly commended. Furthermore, the teachers who are involved in these activities deserve high praise for their valuable contribution to this highly rewarding area of students’ educational experiences.

 

Planning and preparation

 

The Physical Education department is fully engaged in the process of subject planning. The role of subject co-ordinator is rotated on an annual basis, which is good practice as it provides experience for each teacher, as well as sharing the responsibility for the development of the subject among all members of the department. Formal planning meetings are facilitated by management and take place three times per year, at the start of each term, whilst informal meetings occur frequently. Records of formal meetings are maintained and indicate that subject planning includes not only the programme content but also the future priorities for the subject, such as the provision for senior cycle Physical Education and addressing timetabling issues. This good practice is commended as it illustrates considered reflection in order to develop the quality and status of the subject in the school.

 

It is commendable that the Physical Education department has adopted and applied the subject-planning framework recommended by the Junior Cycle Physical Education Support Service (JCPESS). As a result, the subject plan revolves around the implementation of the revised Junior Cycle Physical Education Syllabus and a range of planning documents has been developed for each strand of the syllabus. A comprehensive junior cycle plan outlines the content for each year-group and the required resources as well as references to some teaching and learning strategies, including Mosston and Ashworth’s spectrum of teaching styles. The content plan includes as many of the strands of the syllabus as possible given the space and resource restrictions in the school. Some schemes of work have been developed to support specific strands of the syllabus and these are appropriate and progressive. In some of these schemes, planning for assessment is included and it is recommended that this be expanded for all activity strands. It is commendable that the subject-planning document contains information and strategies relevant to the full inclusion of all students. The subject plan specifically includes a list of strategies for the inclusion of students with Asperger’s Syndrome into the mainstream setting. This inclusive policy within the Physical Education department is highly commended.

 

Health and safety concerns are also addressed in the subject plan, and documents were presented illustrating the policy and procedures relating to the reduction or prevention of injuries as well as procedures for treating and reporting on incidents or injuries that may occur. This practice is commendable as it illustrates a high level of concern for the safety and wellbeing of students during participation in their Physical Education lessons.

 

It was stated that storage of large items presents a difficulty and this was found to be the case. This places additional constraints on the acquisition of new, larger materials such as gymnastics mats or boxes. However, there is some scope for planning for resources to support the teaching and learning of the subject. It is recommended that the Physical Education department plan for the acquisition of some ICT and digital media equipment and identify specific opportunities within the subject plan for its inclusion to enhance the learning experience of students.

 

 

Teaching and learning

 

There was a good standard of teaching and learning in lessons observed during this inspection. Teachers have developed a clear system at the commencement of lessons for student assembly and setting up of the sports hall, whereby attendance and participation are recorded and students assist in the organisation and preparation of the required equipment. Students demonstrated familiarity with and conformity to this system, which resulted in an expedient commencement of the lessons observed.

 

In the lessons observed, the topics taught were health-related-activity and badminton. In some cases, the topic and purpose of the lesson were introduced by recapping on previously learned material and through questioning of students’ knowledge and everyday experiences. This method was effective in helping to focus students on the application and relevance of the new topic of study to their everyday lives. All lessons commenced with a warm-up, and in most cases, this was related to the activity being studied. During this phase of the lesson, the teachers asked students questions to determine their level of understanding of the principles of warm-up and movement. In some cases, students were encouraged to demonstrate mobility exercises, to identify the muscles and joints controlling each movement and to explain each exercise’s relevance to human movement. This is good practice as it encourages an understanding of exercise and its influence on aspects related to physical functioning and wellbeing.

 

Lessons were well paced and activities were appropriately structured to gradually improve competence. A good variety of methods was used to highlight the nature and purpose of set tasks. These included teacher and student demonstration as well as questioning to help identify the correct techniques related to the exercise or skill. Teachers are encouraged to avail of opportunities to extend the use of subject specific terms as well as furthering students’ understanding of the biomechanical principles underpinning each skill. This will help enhance students’ vocabulary to critically analyse movement, as well as their awareness of factors influencing technical efficiency in the execution of motor skills.

 

Students worked in pairs or small groups and were actively engaged in most tasks set. Activities and tasks were appropriate to the abilities of the students and proved equally challenging to the more skilful and less skilful performer alike. This good practice allowed students to work independently and at a level commensurate with their ability and confidence, which is to be commended. Good practice was observed when students were challenged to apply their knowledge and skills to either the game or activity setting. In such situations students learned to apply their knowledge to adjust the intensity of their application in response to their recorded heart rate, or to construct a tactical response in a game setting. This is good practice as students are both cognitively and physically involved in the task. Additionally, the use of team challenge activities was well constructed to promote students’ learning of the social concepts of co-operation and communication in order to achieve success. These activities proved challenging and educationally rewarding to students and this practice is to be commended.

 

Student-teacher rapport was good and this helped to create a respectful learning environment in all cases. Classroom management was both firm and affirming. However, in some cases students found it difficult to hear instructions, due to the acoustics in the hall, which on occasion resulted in some distraction. Best practice was observed when students were called to a central focal point either to demonstrate a technique or practice drill or to change the task. This technique of “centring” served to overcome the acoustics and enabled students to remain focused whilst the teacher explained or demonstrated the relevant teaching points. It is recommended that this technique, or similar, be extended when relevant. In all cases teachers were constantly mobile and assisted individuals or small groups that required assistance in developing their technique or understanding of each task. Such attention was encouraging of students and was well received in all cases. This is highly commended.

 

In most cases, time was taken at the end of lessons to recap on the nature and purpose of the activities and tasks and to reinforce the key points of the lesson. This is commendable practice as it helps students to view their learning as part of a continuum within and between activity blocks. Students demonstrated a good level of co-operation and assisted in putting away and storing their equipment in line with good practice.

 

Assessment

 

A comment on students’ progress in Physical Education is included in the reports to parents that are sent home twice per year at Christmas and summer. It is commendable that the Physical Education department has plans to develop a bank of subject specific comments to be included in the electronic comment database. Once developed these comments should prove to be more informative to both students and parents, reflecting participation and application, competence and progress as well as level of understanding within the subject.

 

The Physical Education department has developed a system of assessment for some modules such as gymnastics. In this case, clear criteria are given for assessment such as duration, combination of skills, fluency of link movements and quality of execution when performing a movement sequence. It is recommended that the Physical Education department continue to develop its assessment process and give consideration to the use of methods available through the junior cycle Physical Education support service.

There was maximum participation levels in all classes observed during the inspection and student responses to questions demonstrated knowledge and good understanding of the key movement concepts being taught.

 

Summary of main findings and recommendations

 

The following are the main strengths identified in the evaluation:

 

  • Physical Education is a core subject at junior cycle.
  • Management is fully supportive of continuing professional development and all Physical Education teachers have attended recent in-service courses.
  • The school is actively implementing the revised Junior Cycle Physical Education Syllabus. 
  • The Physical Education department has developed a good quality programme within the restrictions imposed by the available facilities.
  • The school is proactive in trying to improve its facilities and has purchased a site to develop a full sized playing pitch. It also has plans for a new school including a full-sized sports hall.
  • The school supports students’ involvement in a wide range of extra-curricular physical activities, which are organised and supported by many members of staff.
  • Subject department planning is well advanced and a comprehensive subject plan has been developed for the implementation of the revised Junior Cycle Physical Education Syllabus. Planning also addresses the inclusion of students of all abilities and those with special educational needs.
  • A range of resources has been developed to support the teaching and learning of the subject.
  • There is a good standard of teaching and learning in Physical Education, and students are educated in a positive and respectful environment.
  • Levels of activity and engagement were high in all lessons and set tasks were well paced and structured to improve competence and understanding.
  • The Physical Education department has developed some methods for assessment and the subject is included in reports sent home to parents twice per year.  

 

As a means of building on these strengths and to address areas for development, the following key recommendations are made:

 

  • It is recommended that management review the current provision for Physical Education at senior cycle and that all students be timetabled for Physical Education in line with DES recommendations as outlined in the Rules and Programmes for Secondary Schools.
  • It is recommended that a whiteboard be installed in the sports hall to facilitate teaching and learning in Physical Education.
  • It is recommended that the Physical Education department plan for the acquisition of ICT and digital media equipment and plan for its inclusion to enhance the learning experience of students.
  • Teachers are encouraged to ensure that all students are in a position to see and hear demonstrations and relevant teaching points where applicable.
  • It is recommended that the Physical Education department continue to develop its assessment process and give consideration to the use of methods available through the junior cycle Physical Education support service.

 

Post-evaluation meetings were held with the teachers of Physical Education and with the principal at the conclusion of the evaluation when the draft findings and recommendations of the evaluation were presented and discussed.